Nature Quality in Organic Farming
- Localisation, farm practice, biological conservation, ecosystem functioning and landscape aesthetics
Proposal to the research programme in organic farming: DARCOF II, 2001-04
Summary
Organic farming is an alternative to the intensification and specialisation of agriculture. However, the expectation that organic farming also favours land use and farm practises that supports ecosystem functioning and to a higher extent contribute to nature qualities are generally not well documented.
The proposed project considers the biological, the agricultural and the esthetical aspects of nature quality in organic farming. The overall research question is under which conditions it is possible to favour a high biological diversity in a high yielding organic production system that supports esthetical and recreational opportunities. The farmer and the public may have different priorities, but all three aspects need to be addressed in order to give complete answers.
- Work Package 1 is the forum that brings the researcher in the project together to exchange data, results and ideas, and ensures that appropriate indicators and necessary tools for communication and planning are developed. An important feature is the interrelated research topics (cross-cuttings) based on the broad interdisciplinarity of the project group and the exchange of common data.
- The conversion process and the motivations behind will be analysed in WorkPackage 2 where the geographical localisation, the diversification and the extensification of the farms is related to the landscape and nature qualities of the farms.
- Work Package 3 develops models and principles for the conservation of biological diversity on organic farms including methods to identify areas of interest and indicators to follow the development.
- Work Package 4 examines the conditions for a positive relation between a high crop production and species rich and varied ecosystems on the cultivated fields.
- Work Package 5 analyse the farmer's conception and how it is reflected in the aesthetics and nature values on the farm and develops new instruments of communication on nature and landscape quality.
Research group
Jesper Fredshavn, Head of Department, Lic. agro.: Project
leader: WP 1
Pia Frederiksen, Senior researcher, ph.d.: WP 2
Rasmus Ejrnæs, Researcher, ph.d.WP 3
Jørgen A. Axelsen, Senior researcher, Ph.d. WP 4
Katrine Højring, Researcher, MA, WP 5
A total of 19 scientist will work on the project and the international
collaboration of the experienced research group is broad.
Introduction
In 1999, the Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries published
the 'Action Plan II - developments in organic farming' prepared
by The Organic Food Board. The Action Plan recommended more
research focus on various aspects of nature conservation and
environmental protection and to develop indicators for nature
values. The Action Plan also recommended to initiate research
and to develop tools to be used by farmers and advisors to
integrate on-farm nature values and the food production. Such
tools should be used to monitor the development of nature
values in collaboration between farmers, advisors and regional
authorities (recommendations no 66 and 68). Furthermore, long
term and holistic research on soil fertility in relation to
organic farming practices was recommended as well as an analysis
of the potentials of organic farming as an environmentally
sound agricultural system for future landscape planning (recommendations
no 69 and 74). Bearing in mind the numerous conceptions and
interpretations of nature quality in organic farming it was
decided to precede the research activities with a State of
the art, i.e. a synthesis of knowledge (Tybirk & Alrøe 2001).
The synthesis addressed the questions on how organic farming
could contribute to the national and international obligations
to conserve biological diversity and benefit from ecosystem
functioning (soil fertility and pest control of direct interest
of the farmer). Furthermore, the synthesis addressed the driving
forces in the localisation and development of organic farms
and their associated nature values. Finally, landscape qualities
and esthetical aspects were included in the list of future
research topics. A strong linkage between these research topics
was recommended to facilitate the necessary balancing of these
-sometimes- conflicting considerations.
State of the art
The increase in agricultural productivity achieved by drainage,
intensive soil cultivation, nutrient input and pesticide application
has narrowed the ecological variability of the environment
(OECD 1999, Buller et al. 2000), with a consequent loss of
biological diversity (Hodgson 1986). Organic farming is often
considered an alternative to this development based on numerous
results of a more varied biota in the organically grown fields
(e.g. Stoltze et al. 2000). However, there is only little
evidence that organic farming also favours the areas where
the majority of species are found, namely the permanent grasslands
and the uncultivated areas. The expectation that organic farming
favours land use and farm practises that supports ecosystem
functioning and to a higher extent contribute to nature qualities
(Azeez 2000, Stoltze et al. 2000) are thus generally not well
documented.
Organic farming has increased rapidly in Denmark from 400
farms in 1990 to more than 3,800 farms in year 2000, now covering
more than 160,000 ha or around 6% of the total agricultural
area (E.S. Kristensen, pers. comm.). The specialisation has
changed from primarily dairy farms in mid 1990ies to plant
production farms in late 1990ies. Likewise, the motivation
behind conversion has changed from more ideologically related
causes to a broader variety of motives including expectations
of economic benefit (Noe 2000).
The conversion process and the motivations behind will be
analysed in WorkPackage 2 where the geographical localisation,
the diversification and the extensification of the farms is
related to the landscape and nature qualities of the farms.
Nature quality and biological diversity in organic agriculture
needs to be considered both on the cultivated fields and on
the uncultivated areas. The cultivated areas may benefit from
the ecological services provided by numerous polyphageous
predators (spiders, beetles etc.) and a living and well-structured
soil (Strukturdirektoratet 2000, Axelsen & Langer 2001). At
the same time weeds, pests and pathogens may compromise possibilities
for high crop yields.
Thus, Work Package 4 examines the conditions for a positive
relation between a high crop production and species rich and
varied ecosystems on the cultivated fields and seeks to identify
useful indicators.
The uncultivated areas' including the permanent grasslands
houses the majority of species in the agricultural landscape.
These areas may contribute substantially to the biological
diversity if treated properly, and organic agriculture could
constitute an attractive farming practice in landscapes designated
for the protection of biological diversity (Reddersen et al.
1999, Ejrnæs et. al. 1999).
Work Package 3 develops models and principles for the conservation
of biological diversity on organic farms including methods
to identify areas of interest and indicators to follow the
development.
The farmers as well as the public in general is increasingly
interested in environmental quality, landscape aesthetics
and recreational opportunities (Porteous 1996, Jensen 1998,
1999). How well this awareness from the farmer's side is actually
reflected in the aesthetics and nature values on the farm,
needs to be further analysed. The public awareness and involvement
in the decision-making processes has politically been acknowledged
by the Aarhus Convention, 1998. This situation calls for new
instruments of communication between the general public and
farmers on nature and landscape quality (Noe 1999, Halberg
et al. 2000). These issues will be addressed in Work Package
5 Considering nature quality in organic farming is a consideration
between the biological, the agricultural and the esthetical
aspects (Tybirk & Alrøe 2001).
The farmer and the public may have different priorities, but
all three aspects need to be addressed in order to give complete
answers. Work Package 1 is the forum that brings the researcher
in the project together to exchange data, results and ideas,
and ensures that appropriate indicators and necessary tools
for communication and planning are developed.
This research proposal analyse the present Danish situation
on the three aspects individually in order to reach high scientific
standard, but the project also allocates considerable resources
to the interdisciplinary integration of results and to workshops
that will answer relevant research questions and develop useful
indicators.
Research methodology
Different research methodologies and different disciplines
from natural and social sciences are needed to build up the
necessary knowledge to solve the questions of integrating
nature conservation and esthetical considerations in the organic
farming system. Specific attention must be paid to the integration
of results, synthesis of the overall project and development
of useful indicators.
The project works at various levels and scales. A national
statistical analysis of the present organic farm location
will form the basis for selection of three regional areas
with a high density of organic farms. These areas covers some
2-300 farms representing the variety of farm types and natural
abiotic conditions (soil types, climate) from which farm data
concerning land use, management and production intensity will
be gathered from databases and questionnaires. 20-50 of these
farms will be selected for on-farm registration and analysis
of biological quality. 18 farmers will be selected for in-depth
interviews about their conceptions and considerations concerning
nature and landscape qualities. In addition to this, specific
experimental studies will be carried out in other supplementary
areas for testing specific hypothesis under controlled conditions.
The research covers the habitat level (e.g. rotational field,
hedge, dike and permanent grassland), the farm level (e.g.
farming practice, crop rotation and farm type) and the regional
landscape level (landscape scenarios and landscape perception).
The methods cover geographical, biological and conceptional
analysis. This includes a geographical-statistical description
of organic farm localisation, landscape analysis with respect
to esthetical aspects, on-farm analysis of production, nature
related practise and nature conceptions. It involves individual
and group interviews, workshops and development of indicators
facilitating the communication with the farmers involved.
The biological parts of the research include experimental
manipulation of the farming practice, surveys of the wild
flora and fauna and experiments on colonisation of uncultivated
habitats.
Statistical modelling of consequences of different management
practices will be carried out for cultivated fields, models
to predict habitat quality and biological consequences of
conversion to organic farming at landscape level.
A challenging part of the methodology is the synthesis and
the suggested cross-cuttings presented in WP 1. This includes
internal workshops where the process of understanding and
integration of results from the different WPs will take place.
Furthermore, the external presentation and discussion of the
results with the scientific community, with political decision-makers
and with the involved farmers and their advisors are crucial
indicators for the success of the proposal.
Objectives and expected achievements
The overall aim of the project is to identify the key components
that ensure a continuous development of organic farming towards
a closer integration of nature quality with food production.
To accomplish this, the project will develop a common platform
of understanding of how the localisation, diversity and intensity
of organic farms influence landscape and nature quality (Driving
forces and Pressure indicators). WP 2 will achieve this. This
platform will qualify and give perspective to the discussion
of how the three major components (State-Impact indicators)
of nature quality as identified recently (Tybirk & Alrøe 2001)
can be combined locally and regionally:
- biological diversity (WP 3)
- ecosystem functioning (WP 4)
- esthetical landscape perception (WP 5)
The project will develop relevant definitions and simple indicators to identify each aspect separately. However, the multi-disciplinarity of this project gives us an opportunity bring the separate analysis together and investigate how these potentially conflicting considerations can be integrated (WP 1) and suggest future pathways for the development of organic farming.
The project will focus on identifying relationships between the three aspects separately and in combination, and scenarios will be used to show the consequences of organic farming practices for selected nature quality aspects.
The project is expected to achieve detailed information on the historic development of localisation of organic farms and the conditions that influence this. The organic farmers, their farming practices, their intentions and actual ability to conserve and promote biological and ecological as well as esthetical qualities will be characterised in details with the aim of identifying barriers and possible solutions for the development of organic farming.
The project will be able to characterise organic farmed landscapes and their biological attributes and develop tools for communication of different conceptions of nature.
Relevant indicators will be developed to enable farmers, the public and the administrative bodies to set goals for an integration of nature quality considerations in the future development of a sustainable organic farming on the habitat, the farm and the landscape level. These indicators will also be appropriate to measure whether organic farming is actually approaching these goals.
Description of Workpackages 1-5.
WP 1:Project management and interactions - cross-cuttings between workpackages
Workpackage number: 1
Start date or starting event: 01.04.2001
Responsible person: Jesper Fredshavn (NERI)
Contributing persons: Knud Tybirk (NERI) and all project participants
Person-months: 8 (The resources of the cross-cuttings 1-9 are part of the contributing Workpackages 2-5)
Objectives:
- to co-ordinate the work and the exchange of knowledge generated in WP 2-5
- to ensure the production of common interdisciplinary syntheses contribution to the overall objectives of the project and
- to develop tools and indicators for application of results
Deliverables:
- Starting-up seminar
- Annual co-ordination meeting
- Annual status report
- CC1: Impact of farm localisation and character on biological diversity.
- CC2: Farm management, ownership, collaboration, value conceptions and nature values.
- CC3: Farmers conception of nature and actual biological quality of his farm.
- CC4: Workshop on the aesthetic perception of biological quality.
- CC5: Functional interpretation of the response of arthropods to the organically farmed landscape.
- CC6: Deleted due to budget reductions.
- CC7: Landscape scenarios.
- CC8: Workshop on identified correlations.
- CC9: International workshop on Indicators.
WP 2:Localisation, diversification and extensification in organic farming
Workpackage number: 2
Start date or starting event: 01.05.2001
Responsible person:Pia Frederiksen
Contributing persons: Pia Frederiksen (NERI), Vibeke Langer (RVAU), Peter Eigaard (NERI), Pernille Kaltoft (NERI)
Person-months: 30 man-months, covering tasks 1, 2, 3 and part of 4.
Objectives:
Overall: To explore land use and farm practises in organic farming at the farm, local and regional level, and its impact on the landscape and nature quality, within the context of localisation, diversification and extensification processes.
- To explore the present status of the national conversion to organic farming, by analysing the characteristics of the landscapes involved, the regional diversity and land use intensity of organic farms, and the spatial overlap of organic farms and valuable or protected nature types.
- To analyse the spatial pattern of organic farm localisation as a basis for selection of case study areas.
- To explore how and to which extent former and emerging local social relations and ways of knowledge and information dissemination influence the conversion process and its spatial character.
- For selected case areas to study the nature management practises, i.e. agricultural and other farm related practises and land use that impact nature and landscape qualities on the present organic farms. Moreover to explore how these management practises are related to certain characteristics of the farms, like production, ownership, structural diversity and farmers collaboration network.
- To analyse if and how changes in nature management practise, land use and landscape structures can be related to the history of conversion from conventional to organic production.
- Deleted due to budget reductions.
Deliverables:
- Spatial statistical description of farm types, densities and land use intensity
- Regional processes in Danish organic production
- Social relations and spatial pattern: case area 1
- Social relations and spatial pattern: case area 2 and 3
- Integration of spatial and social processes in organic farming
- Database fully available for cross-cuttings
- Production, diversity and nature practise on existing organic farms in Denmark
- Changes in farm diversity and nature practise with conversion to organic farming
- The impact of organic farming on landscape structure and -change
- Deleted due to budget reductions
WP 3: Biological diversity and organic farming
- past destruction, present condition and future opportunities
Workpackage number: 3
Start date or starting event: 01.05.2001
Responsible person: Rasmus Ejrnæs
Contributing persons: NERI: Rasmus Ejrnæs, Erik Aude, Roar S. Poulsen
NHMA: Peter Gjelstrup
AAU: Søren Toft
Person-months: 22 scientific and 17 technical
Objectives:
Overall objective: To develop principles and models for conservation and promotion of biological diversity on organic farms
In order to achieve this, the following underlying objectives will be pursued:
- To identify and describe the distribution of biological diversity within organic farms
- To analyse the preconditions for biological diversity on organic farms
- To develop indicators and methods for evaluating the influence of farm management on the biological conditions
Deliverables:
- The contribution of organic agriculture to biological diversity.
- Manuscript: The importance of colonisation limitation for the diversity of grassland and hedgerows on organic farms.
- Deleted due to budget reductions.
- Manuscript: Predicting plant and invertebrate diversity in grassland habitats of organic farms.
- Manuscript: Functional interpretation of the distribution of selected arthropod groups in the agricultural landscape.
- Indicators for habitat quality in organic agriculture.
- Deleted due to budget reductions
- Deleted due to budget reductions
WP 4:Ecosystem diversity and function of the fields in organic farming
Workpackage number: 4
Start date or starting event: 01-01-2002
Responsible person:Jørgen Aagaard Axelsen (NERI)
Contributing persons: Paul Henning Krogh (NERI), Søren Toft (AAU), Gabor Lövei (DIAS), Chris Topping, Poul Nygaard Andersen, Geoff Groom and Peter Odderskær (NERI)
Person-months: 33 scientific+23 technical
Objectives:
To provide knowledge on how to optimise, at the same time, both nature quality and crop yield in organic fields.
Sub-objectives:
- To develop an indicator system of nature quality in organic fields.
- To test the hypotheses that enhanced biodiversity favours beneficial ecological processes.
- Evaluate the consequences of various organic agricultural practices and changes in landscape structures on mobile organisms use of the landscape.
Deliverables:
- Suggestion to indicator system
- Scientific paper on indicator system
- Suggestions for changes in management practice to promote selected species in organic fields
- Deleted due to budget reductions
- Scientific paper on the connection between soil fauna and polyphageous predators
- Scientific paper on the relation between biodiversity and aphid control
- Entry at the Danish Plant Protection conference
- Scientific paper on the impacts of various organic farm practices on the mobile organisms
- Deleted due to budget reductions
WP 5:Organic Farming and Landscape Quality - Perceptions and Practices
Work package number: 5
Start date or starting event: 01-06-01
Responsible person:Katrine Højring (DFLRI)
Contributing persons: Egon Noe (DIAS)
Person-months: 34
Objectives:
- To investigate the relationship between the organic farmers' value conceptions and management practices, and the aesthetic qualities of the landscape.
- To investigate potentials and obstacles on the individual level for the integration of nature and landscape considerations in food production.
Task 1: Analyse and describe the aesthetic consequences of organic farming on landscape and farm level.
Task 2: Analyse the role of the farmer's value conceptions and production logic in the production and maintenance of nature and landscape values.
Task 3: Develop methods for awareness raising and communication about nature and landscape quality in decision-making processes.
Deliverables:
- The aesthetic perception of biological quality
- The aesthetic perception of biological quality
- The aesthetic quality of organically farmed landscapes
- Nature and landscape quality - organic farmers value conceptions
- Value conceptions, farm maintenance and biological quality
- The contribution of farming practice to aesthetic quality
- Local participation in nature and landscape quality assessment
- Deleted due to budget reductions
- Indicators for nature and landscape quality as instruments in awareness raising and decision-making
Collaborative partners
Danish Research Center for Organic Farming (DARCOF)
National Environmental Research Institute, NERI, Dept. of Landscape Ecology, Dept of Policy analysis and Dept. of Terrestrial Ecology.
Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, RVAU
Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute (DFLRI)
The Natural History Museum, Aarhus (NHMA)
University of Aarhus, AAU
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences (DIAS)
Tromsø University, Institute for Planning and Community Studies, Tromsø, Norway
Stiftelsen for naturforskning og kulturminneforskning, Oslo, NINA,
Tartu University, Inst. of Botany and Ecology, Estonia
Institute of Local Government Studies, Copenhagen
University of Southern Denmark, Centre for History, Esbjerg
|